Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: gllamm - multilevel models and complex samples
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: gllamm - multilevel models and complex samples
Date
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:02:22 -0500
Stephen,
cluster() option is a cluster, or PSU, not a stratum. Neither -gllamm-
nor -mixed- support stratification proper.
-- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC)
-- Principal Survey Scientist, Abt SRBI
-- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
position of my employer
-- http://stas.kolenikov.name
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Porter, Stephen (Contractor)
<srporter/[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to estimate a random effects model on a survey that has
> measurements nested within students nested within schools (the PSUs),
> with stratification and weights.
>
> Running the model with weights is clear, but after looking at the
> documentation and Rabe-Hesketh and Skrindal (2006), it's not clear to me
> how to take the stratification into account. I *think* it's the cluster
> option with the strata variable, but am not certain. Any advice or
> resources would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/