Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Re: estout
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: RE: Re: estout
Date
Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:12:21 +0000
Thanks for providing a reproducible example.
As I said, I don't use -estout- (SSC) but I do recall some properties
of exp(). Setting aside what the numbers represent, the difference
between any exp(x_1) and any exp(x_2) can be positive, zero, or
negative, so there is no surprise that it can be negative. A fortiori,
what you are calculating cannot be a standard error. The error here is
not in -estout- and not in Stata [NB] but, I guess, in using an
incorrect formula.
Nick
[email protected]
On 12 March 2014 04:46, Yuesheng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> That is a very good point; here is the example I can come up with:
> sysuse auto
> poisson price weight mpg
>
> estout, cells(b se) transform(weight
> exp(_b[weight]+_b[mpg])-exp(_b[weight])
> exp(_b[weight]+_b[mpg])-exp(_b[weight]) mpg
> exp(_b[weight]+_b[mpg])-exp(_b[weight]) exp(_b[weight]+_b[mpg]))
>
>
> Here, I want to calculate the term
> "exp(_b[weight]+_b[mpg])-exp(_b[weight]) "; the STATA gives the
> following results:
>
> b/se
> price
> weight -.0123634
> -1.000255
> mpg -.0123634
> .0004759
> _cons 8.179377
> .0194376
>
> Note that the standard error is -1.000255.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Yuesheng
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No doubt, but you are still not giving any details of the code you used.
>>
>> How can users of -estout- (SSC) (not me, by the way) explain whether
>> you messed up your code when you don't even say what it is!
>>
>> A reproducible example -- one based on a dataset we can all access --
>> would be even better.
>>
>> Nick
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Yuesheng Wu
>>
>>> Thanks for your help.
>>> I did not export the estimation results to Excel: I just did
>>> everything in Stata.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Rubil Ivica <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> you are probably exporting your results to Excel, right? If so, then you
>>>> need either of the following two options: "nopa" or "brackets".
>>>> The problem is that estout by default puts standard errors in
>>>> parentheses (std.err.) and when this is exported to Excel, it becomes
>>>> -std.err. This
>>>> is a convention in accounting that instead od negative values those are
>>>> put in parentheses. "nopa" will drop parentheses, and "brackets" will
>>>> put
>>>> berackets [...] instead of parentheses (...). Hopefully this helps.
>>
>> Yuesheng Wu
>>
>>>> After I run the Poisson regression by "poisson", I use to estout to
>>>> calculate standard error of a term with the estimates of two parameters;
>>>> it turns out the standard error is negative. I am just wondering whether
>>>> the estout only works for one parameter; or I mess up with the code.
>>>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/