Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Re: estout
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: RE: Re: estout
Date
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 18:18:30 +0000
No doubt, but you are still not giving any details of the code you used.
How can users of -estout- (SSC) (not me, by the way) explain whether
you messed up your code when you don't even say what it is!
A reproducible example -- one based on a dataset we can all access --
would be even better.
Nick
[email protected]
Yuesheng Wu
> Thanks for your help.
> I did not export the estimation results to Excel: I just did
> everything in Stata.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Rubil Ivica <[email protected]> wrote:
>> you are probably exporting your results to Excel, right? If so, then you
>> need either of the following two options: "nopa" or "brackets".
>> The problem is that estout by default puts standard errors in
>> parentheses (std.err.) and when this is exported to Excel, it becomes
>> -std.err. This
>> is a convention in accounting that instead od negative values those are
>> put in parentheses. "nopa" will drop parentheses, and "brackets" will
>> put
>> berackets [...] instead of parentheses (...). Hopefully this helps.
Yuesheng Wu
>> After I run the Poisson regression by "poisson", I use to estout to
>> calculate standard error of a term with the estimates of two parameters;
>> it turns out the standard error is negative. I am just wondering whether
>> the estout only works for one parameter; or I mess up with the code.
>>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/