Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist |
Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:44:50 -0500 |
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > MATLAB [sic] uses a different structure for graphs as I understand it, > in which you can modify an existing graph by issuing later commands. > That's a great idea, but it's never been the way the production of > Stata graphs works. It _is_ (loosely) the way that the Graph Editor > works. The two modes fit together a bit awkwardly, and the awkwardness > bites here. Ah, well I do like the graph system and the graph editor but the ability for MATLAB (is it all caps?) to take a graph "as is" and generate code for it is really great. A lot of times I would edit a graph by hand to get the graph roughly looking the way I wanted and then save the code and tweak it. In short, I used it the way I use Stata's GUI for syntax in complex procedures such as -xtmelogit-, where there are tons of options and having the GUI is cool to lay it all out in front of you. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/