Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist
Date
Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:23:39 +0000
MATLAB [sic] uses a different structure for graphs as I understand it,
in which you can modify an existing graph by issuing later commands.
That's a great idea, but it's never been the way the production of
Stata graphs works. It _is_ (loosely) the way that the Graph Editor
works. The two modes fit together a bit awkwardly, and the awkwardness
bites here.
Nick
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> What is "the syntax"?
>
> I mean syntax that would regenerate the graph I just created and then
> edited, I guess. Matlab does this very well.
>
>>
>> The Graph Recorder echoes how the Editor works, which is not by
>> reissuing -graph- commands one by one.
>
> I'll have to give it a try. I keep finding that Stata does have
> features I want, I just don't always know where they are or what their
> full power is. I'm suspecting that's true for a lot of us, even if
> we've used the software for a while.
>
>
>
>> All graph users would like to see a single -graph- command that would
>> produce the final graph, but I gather that's not possible in general.
>
> Pity.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/