Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
From
Cameron McIntosh <[email protected]>
To
STATA LIST <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
Date
Sat, 19 May 2012 09:42:16 -0400
Indeed:
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328-331.http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/signif4.pdf
----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:51:05 +0100
>
> On Sat, May 19 2012, Abdelouahid Tajar wrote:
>
> > But my model
> > shows that the interaction is non signficant the slpoe of time for the
> > reference (group 0) is non significant but the time slope for group 1 is
> > significant hence the confusion.
>
> Google "the difference between significant and not significant is not
> significant" for an interesting discussion on this topic.
>
> Brendan
> --
> Brendan Halpin, Department of Sociology, University of Limerick, Ireland
> Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-338562; Room F1-009 x 3147
> mailto:[email protected] ULSociology on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/fjIK9t
> http://teaching.sociology.ul.ie/bhalpin/wordpress twitter:@ULSociology
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/