Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
From
[email protected] (Brendan Halpin)
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
Date
Sat, 19 May 2012 13:51:05 +0100
On Sat, May 19 2012, Abdelouahid Tajar wrote:
> But my model
> shows that the interaction is non signficant the slpoe of time for the
> reference (group 0) is non significant but the time slope for group 1 is
> significant hence the confusion.
Google "the difference between significant and not significant is not
significant" for an interesting discussion on this topic.
Brendan
--
Brendan Halpin, Department of Sociology, University of Limerick, Ireland
Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-338562; Room F1-009 x 3147
mailto:[email protected] ULSociology on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/fjIK9t
http://teaching.sociology.ul.ie/bhalpin/wordpress twitter:@ULSociology
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/