Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
From
Joerg Luedicke <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: GLLAMM: logitic regression interaction non signficant but lincom gives signficant result
Date
Sat, 19 May 2012 06:35:45 -0700
In your model, you are testing whether the two slopes are sign.
different from each other. With the -lincom- test you are testing
whether the second slope is sign. different from zero. Those are obv.
different tests. Besides, make sure you got the denominator right. I
am not sure how -gllamm- handles it but I know of other software that
want _total minus success_ (i.e. failure) as the denominator, _not_
total.
J.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Brendan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19 2012, Abdelouahid Tajar wrote:
>
>> But my model
>> shows that the interaction is non signficant the slpoe of time for the
>> reference (group 0) is non significant but the time slope for group 1 is
>> significant hence the confusion.
>
> Google "the difference between significant and not significant is not
> significant" for an interesting discussion on this topic.
>
> Brendan
> --
> Brendan Halpin, Department of Sociology, University of Limerick, Ireland
> Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-338562; Room F1-009 x 3147
> mailto:[email protected] ULSociology on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/fjIK9t
> http://teaching.sociology.ul.ie/bhalpin/wordpress twitter:@ULSociology
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/