Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
Date
Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:42:12 -0500
At 12:50 AM 2/8/2012, Muhammad Anees wrote:
Also the abstract in online from Guimarães, P (2008) is
In this paper I show that the conditional fixed effects negative
binomial model for count panel data does not control for individual
fixed effects unless a very specific set of assumptions are met. I
also propose a score test to verify whether these assumptions are met.
The full reference for the paper is
Guimarães, P., (2008), The fixed effects negative binomial model
revisited, Economics Letters, 99, pp6366
It, thus, indicates to take care when to choose the fixed effects
model while using Negative Binomial Regressions.
William Greene also has some working papers on this, e.g.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1281928
I can't say that I fully understand his
arguments, but he says things like "The
difference between the HHG and true FE models is
that HHG builds the effects into the variance of
the random variable, not the mean. Thus, we
cannot conclude that the HHG estimator is a
consistent estimator of a model that contains a
heterogeneous mean...it is reasonable to conclude
that the HHG estimator is at least potentially
problematic...In the HHG fixed effects NB model,
the fixed effects enter the model through the
dispersion parameter rather than the conditional
mean function. This has the implication that time
invariant variables can coexist with the effects.
This calls the interpretation of the
heterogeneity in the model into question."
On the other hand he proposes some alternatives
but notes that they have problems too. At this
point I am thinking the safest route is to make
sure you never study a problem that requires
negative binomial regression with fixed effects. ;-)
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/