Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
From
Shikha Sinha <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
Date
Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:41:36 -0800
Hi Anees,
Yes, fixed effect can be used in cross-sectional data, where within
county variation will be exploited. Using dummies is a possibility but
I was just wondering why I do not get the same result with -xtnbreg
with fe option.
Thanks for the response though.
Santosh
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Muhammad Anees <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you sure about the fixed effects with cross sectional data? Why
> not use dummies(categories) where you need to check the fixed effects.
>
> Best,
> Anees
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Shikha Sinha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am trying to model count data with county fixed effect. It is a
>> cross-sectional data. I want to know if
>>
>> xi: nbreg DV IV control i.county
>>
>> is same as
>>
>> xtnbreg DV IV control, fe i(county)
>>
>> I get different results. Please advise what is the best way to model
>> count data with fixed effect.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Shikha
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best
> ---------------------------
> Muhammad Anees
> Assistant Professor/Programme Coordinator
> COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
> Attock 43600, Pakistan
> http://www.aneconomist.com
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/