Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
From
Muhammad Anees <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: nbreg with fixed effect vs xtnbreg,fe
Date
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:27:15 +0500
Yes, observations might be siblings. I agree.
Thank you Richard.
Best,
Anees
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Richard Williams
<[email protected]> wrote:
> At 07:51 AM 2/7/2012, Muhammad Anees wrote:
>>
>> Yes I totally admit my confusing line by defining time periods as time
>> variable, but what I have understood so far (which is very limited)
>> about panel data fixed effects, is that there should be observations
>> for two time periods atleast, even if not the time is not existing in
>> the data.
>
>
> This is not my strong area, but I think the key thing is that you need two
> or more of something; it doesn't need to be time periods, it could, for
> example, be siblings. As far as I can tell, the -clogit- command is pretty
> much the same as -xtlogit, fe- and yet the manual's examples given for
> -clogit- are very different than the examples for -xtlogit, fe- .
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Best
---------------------------
Muhammad Anees
Assistant Professor/Programme Coordinator
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
Attock 43600, Pakistan
http://www.aneconomist.com
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/