Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
Attachment:
zinb_syn.do
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: synthetic ZINB
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: RE: synthetic ZINB
Date
Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:31:50 -0400 (EDT)
Statalisters:
I happened to see a discussion of synthetic ZINB data on the StataList
digest today. There is an entirely different way to approach this - one
that creates a full synthetic ZINB model. I wrote about creating
synthetic models in the first volume of the 2010 Stata Journal, and
discuss them much more fully in my recently published, second edition
of "Negative Binomial Regression" (Cambridge University Press, 572
pages). The book discusses most every count model in the literature,
providing both Stata and R code for examples. Output is given in Stata,
except for the final chapter on Bayesian NB models. I also develop a
variety of synthetic count models where it is simple to write your
chosen synthetic predictors as continuous predictors, as binary, or as
multilevel categorical. You may employ as many predictors as you wish,
from an intercept-only model to one with more than 10 predictors if you
wish. The user specifes the desired coefficients for all predictors, as
well as levels of predictor. For NB models you also declare the value
of alpha you wish to model.
It was quite simple to convert the synthetic NB2-logit hurdle model I
give in the book to a zero-inflated NB model, with a logit binary
component. I am attaching it to this message, but provide it below my
signature as well, together with a sample run. Note where the
coefficient values are defined in the comment above active code, but
the actual values are given in the code where indicated. I made the
predictors here be simple normal variates, but more complex structures
are described in the book, and in the Stata Journal article.
I find synthetic models like this very useful for testing model
assumptions.
Best, Joseph Hilbe
ZINB_SYN.DO
==================================================
* Zero inflated Negative binomial with logit as binary component
* Joseph Hilbe 5Jun2011 zinb_syn.do
* LOGIT: x1=-.9, x2=-.1, _c=-.2
* NB2 : x1=.75, n2=-1.25, _c=2, alpha=.5
clear
set obs 50000
set seed 1000
gen x1 = invnorm(runiform())
gen x2 = invnorm(runiform())
* NEGATIVE BINOMIAL- NB2
gen xb = 2 + 0.75*x1 - 1.25*x2
gen a = .5
gen ia = 1/a
gen exb = exp(xb)
gen xg = rgamma(ia, a)
gen xbg = exb * xg
gen nby = rpoisson(xbg)
* BERNOULLI
gen pi =1/(1+exp(-(.9*x1 + .1*x2+.2)))
gen bernoulli = runiform()>pi
gen zy = bernoulli*nby
rename zy y
* NB2-LOGIT HURDLE
zinb y x1 x2, inf(x1 x2) nolog
=================================
Zero-inflated negative binomial regression Number of obs =
50000
Nonzero obs =
19181
Zero obs =
30819
Inflation model = logit LR chi2(2) =
24712.97
Log likelihood = -88361.63 Prob > chi2 =
0.0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------
-----
y |
x1 | .7407043 .0066552 111.30 0.000 .7276604
.7537483
x2 | -1.249479 .0067983 -183.79 0.000 -1.262804
-1.236155
_cons | 1.996782 .0069297 288.15 0.000 1.9832
2.010364
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------
-----
inflate |
x1 | .9047498 .0141011 64.16 0.000 .8771121
.9323875
x2 | .095477 .0125229 7.62 0.000 .0709326
.1200213
_cons | .2031966 .0121878 16.67 0.000 .179309
.2270841
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------
-----
/lnalpha | -.6778044 .0153451 -44.17 0.000 -.7078803
-.6477286
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------
-----
alpha | .5077305 .0077912 .4926874
.5232329
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Description: Binary data