Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: svy, stepwise, and xi, with a by(variable) tacked on for good measure
From
"Costello, Michael (Contractor)" <mcostello/[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: svy, stepwise, and xi, with a by(variable) tacked on for good measure
Date
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:31:39 -0400
Statalist,
I have a data set that looks like this:
yvar
xvar1
xvar2
xvar3
xvar4 where xvar4 is categorical with 6 levels
The data is weighted with the svy command. I would like to do a backwards selection.
What works:
xi i.var4
stepwise, pr(.05): regress yvar xvar1 xvar2 xvar3 _Ixvar4_2 _Ixvar4_3 _Ixvar4_4 _Ixvar4_5 _Ixvar4_6 [pw=wt_final]
but when I use
xi i.var4
by (year), stepwise, pr(.05): regress yvar xvar1 xvar2 xvar3 _Ixvar4_2 _Ixvar4_3 _Ixvar4_4 _Ixvar4_5 _Ixvar4_6 [pw=wt_final]
stata flips out, even though http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?stepwise says it should work (second line under the syntax, options box).
And is this even doing the weights? I'm used to using the svy functions.
Lastly, is there a more succinct way of doing categorical variables? I have several, and this process for including them is annoying. I cannot get the xi: function to work either. Wait, is there a limit on the number of parameters BEFORE the colon?
Thanks so much for any guidance you can give.
--
Michael Costello
Intern, Education Policy and Systems
RTI International
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/