Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: svy, stepwise, and xi, with a by(variable) tacked on for good measure
From
Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: svy, stepwise, and xi, with a by(variable) tacked on for good measure
Date
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:44:46 +0100
Michael Costello wrote:
> Statalist,
>
> I have a data set that looks like this:
> yvar
> xvar1
> xvar2
> xvar3
> xvar4 where xvar4 is categorical with 6 levels
>
> The data is weighted with the svy command. I would like to do a backwards selection.
>
>
> What works:
> xi i.var4
> stepwise, pr(.05): regress yvar xvar1 xvar2 xvar3 _Ixvar4_2 _Ixvar4_3 _Ixvar4_4 _Ixvar4_5 _Ixvar4_6 [pw=wt_final]
>
>
> but when I use
> xi i.var4
> by (year), stepwise, pr(.05): regress yvar xvar1 xvar2 xvar3 _Ixvar4_2 _Ixvar4_3 _Ixvar4_4 _Ixvar4_5 _Ixvar4_6 [pw=wt_final]
>
> stata flips out, even though http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?stepwise says it should work (second line under the syntax, options box).
>
> And is this even doing the weights? I'm used to using the svy functions.
> Lastly, is there a more succinct way of doing categorical variables? I have several, and this process for including them is annoying. I cannot get the xi: function to work either. Wait, is there a limit on the number of parameters BEFORE the colon?
>
> Thanks so much for any guidance you can give.
Seriously, don't bother with -stepwise- and stick to estimating the
full model using -regress-, -svy regress- or whatever it is you're
using: stepwise regression just produces lots of garbage that you
don't need to read. That said, the following code works for me using
the -bysort- command:
webuse nhanes2
svyset psu [pweight=leadwt], strata(strata)
xi: bysort region: stepwise, pr(.05): regress loglead age female black
orace i.hsizgp ///
smsa1 smsa2 [pw=leadwt]
--
Clive Nicholas
[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]
"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/