Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AW: Suest v/s biprob in stata 11
From
Prakash Kashwan <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AW: Suest v/s biprob in stata 11
Date
Sun, 4 Jul 2010 15:52:38 -0400
Hi Martin,
Thanks so much for a prompt response. By user friendly menus, I meant
the SPSS kind of interface that Stata 11 has to offer. In the process
of responding to your query I have also discovered that Stata 11 does
offer a similar menu for the suest command, but still doesn't give me
test statistics. Below, I describe the two different ways in which
Stata 11 carries out 'Seemingly Unrelated Estimation'
Menu -1: Statistics > Statistics > Binary Outcomes > Seemingly
unrelated estimation
This menu runs the following command
biprobit (probit model 1) (probit model2), vce(robust) noskip
difficult nonrtolerance
Menu -2: Statistics > Postestimation > Tests > Seemingly unrelated estimation
This one runs the suest command
suest probitModel1 probitModel2, vce(robust)
And, this is the one I want to use, but it doesn't give me test
statistics; basically to find out if suest offers me additional
leverage (as compared to each of the models run independently).
Many thanks,
Prakash
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> <>
>
>
> " The
> new user friendly menus use biprob command, which gives me different
> results compared to when I use suest posestimation command"
>
>
> What does "the new user friendly menus" mean? And what is the -biprob-
> command/where did you obtain it???
>
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Prakash Kashwan
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Juli 2010 19:22
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: Suest v/s biprob in stata 11
>
> Dear All,
> I have a couple of queries regarding how suest works in Stata 11. The
> new user friendly menus use biprob command, which gives me different
> results compared to when I use suest posestimation command - I wonder
> if biprob does utilize the leverage offered by correlating residuals
> of two models involved. In any case, I get different results with
> these two commands. Moreover, when I run suest it doesn't give me any
> test statistics so that I know if using suest (as opposed to
> independent robust estimates) gives me additional leverage. I have
> extensively searched for clues on these issues but no success at all.
> Am I missing something obvious here? I will appreciate help with
> figuring out how to make test give me test statistics following the
> suest command.
> Prakash
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
--
Prakash Kashwan <http://mypage.iu.edu/~pkashwan/>
School of Public & Environmental Affairs (SPEA)
Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis; Indiana University,
Bloomington
Research Fellow (2009) - International Foundation for Science (Sweden)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/