Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: AW: Suest v/s biprob in stata 11 |
Date | Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:20:44 +0200 |
<> " The new user friendly menus use biprob command, which gives me different results compared to when I use suest posestimation command" What does "the new user friendly menus" mean? And what is the -biprob- command/where did you obtain it??? HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Prakash Kashwan Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Juli 2010 19:22 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: Suest v/s biprob in stata 11 Dear All, I have a couple of queries regarding how suest works in Stata 11. The new user friendly menus use biprob command, which gives me different results compared to when I use suest posestimation command - I wonder if biprob does utilize the leverage offered by correlating residuals of two models involved. In any case, I get different results with these two commands. Moreover, when I run suest it doesn't give me any test statistics so that I know if using suest (as opposed to independent robust estimates) gives me additional leverage. I have extensively searched for clues on these issues but no success at all. Am I missing something obvious here? I will appreciate help with figuring out how to make test give me test statistics following the suest command. Prakash * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/