Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
From
Nick Winter <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
Date
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:37:46 -0400
At the risk of provoking flames - can someone articulate the reason
*for* citing the statistical software used in a book or article,
especially in the case where only very standard statistical tools are
used? We don't, for example, generally cite the word processor,
citation management software, and other computer tools used in the
course of our research....
- Nick Winter
On 6/21/2010 7:16 PM, Neil Shephard wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob)
<[email protected]> wrote:
That would be great if people used the standard citations. Some fields
routinely don't mention software used and oddly enough articles in the R
Journal do not cite R, as it's assumed that's what they're about.
Someone on the R list found the standard citation misspelled a bunch of
ways. Maddening!
Yep, I realise the limitations, but it was another angle that hadn't
been mentioned.
Personally I will endeavour to ensure that Stata, R or any other
software is correctly cited in any papers/work that I'm involved in.
Neil
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholas Winter 434.924.6994 t
Assistant Professor 434.924.3359 f
Department of Politics [email protected] e
University of Virginia faculty.virginia.edu/nwinter w
PO Box 400787, S385 Gibson Hall
Charlottesville, VA 22904
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/