Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
From
SR Millis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
Date
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
See Section 5.8 ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES FOR CLINICAL TRIALS E9:
http://www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA485.pdf
Scott Millis
--- On Thu, 6/24/10, Nick Winter <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nick Winter <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 1:37 PM
> At the risk of provoking flames - can
> someone articulate the reason *for* citing the statistical
> software used in a book or article, especially in the case
> where only very standard statistical tools are used?
> We don't, for example, generally cite the word processor,
> citation management software, and other computer tools used
> in the course of our research....
>
> - Nick Winter
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/