Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
From
Neil Shephard <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: AW: Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...
Date
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:16:32 +0000
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That would be great if people used the standard citations. Some fields
> routinely don't mention software used and oddly enough articles in the R
> Journal do not cite R, as it's assumed that's what they're about.
> Someone on the R list found the standard citation misspelled a bunch of
> ways. Maddening!
>
Yep, I realise the limitations, but it was another angle that hadn't
been mentioned.
Personally I will endeavour to ensure that Stata, R or any other
software is correctly cited in any papers/work that I'm involved in.
Neil
--
"... no scientific worker has a fixed level of significance at which
from year to year, and in all circumstances, he rejects hypotheses; he
rather gives his mind to each particular case in the light of his
evidence and his ideas." - Sir Ronald A. Fisher (1956)
Email - [email protected]
Website - http://slack.ser.man.ac.uk/
Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/