Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Stata updated to 11.1
From
"Ploutz-Snyder, Robert (JSC-SK)[USRA]" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: RE: RE: Stata updated to 11.1
Date
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:52:49 -0500
For what it's worth, I'm also unsuccessful at the update, but it does not appear to be due to delays or network traffic, but rather the same problem that Al reported yesterday. Stata is telling me that my files are up to date, yet I know them not to be.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Weiss
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AW: st: RE: RE: RE: Stata updated to 11.1
<>
" but took far longer than my past experiences."
I would say that we need to be fair here, and acknowledge that there used to
be no such thing as a "utility update" in the past. The two manuals that had
to be transferred to (probably) thousands of Stata 11 users last night, [D]
and [R], "weigh" a cool 23 MB combined. With many simultaneous requests, I
can understand that network infrastructure would be struggling to deliver
this volume of data fast. Comparisons with updates for -version- 10 and
prior are hence terribly skewed in favor of the past...
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Neil Shephard
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2010 17:56
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: st: RE: RE: RE: Stata updated to 11.1
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Lachenbruch, Peter
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I had a similar issue - the update utilities was slow, so a cancelled and
updated the executable, did the swap and then did the update utilities. It
was slow but eventually completed. I'm doing the updates now on my netbook.
It went much faster this morning on a much slower machine.
>
> Keep trying.
I did and it succeeded eventually, but took far longer than my past
experiences.
Good to know I wasn't the only one though.
Cheers,
Neil
--
"... no scientific worker has a fixed level of significance at which
from year to year, and in all circumstances, he rejects hypotheses; he
rather gives his mind to each particular case in the light of his
evidence and his ideas." - Sir Ronald A. Fisher (1956)
Email - [email protected]
Website - http://slack.ser.man.ac.uk/
Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/