Thank you very much Clive.
I only hope to find the right proxies for political reforms, which is not very easy.
Best,
Emanuele
----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:02:07 +0100
> Subject: st: Re: st: Unbalanced panel data with non -random missing data
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> Emanuele Canegrati wrote:
>
>> I am analyzing a panel data of firms for years 1978, 1988, 1998, 2003. The total number of firms changes across years and, as a consequence of several mergers and acquisitions, I have very few examples of firms existing in all the four years.
>>
>> I also think that the total number of firms does not change randomly, but it is due to some endogenous factor (i.e. political reforms which incentive firms to merge or to go public).
>>
>> Could you please tell me which are the econometric problems I could face with such an unbalanced panel? Is there any way to correct it?
>
> If by 'endogenous factors', you mean variables correlated with the
> error term, most probably because they have been omitted, a good
> solution would be to include them, in this case as dummy variables.
>
> --
> Clive Nicholas
>
> [Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
> . Please respond to contributions I make in
> a list thread here. Thanks!]
>
> "My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
> methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
