|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: re: problems with Windows Vista
<>
Gaby said
I always run Stata as administrator in windows vista, for updating or
not. I find, it runs smoother.
The whole point of having an administrator role or, as in Unix/Linux/
MacOSX, a 'superuser' is to ensure that any 'ordinary' user process
cannot stomp on stuff that should be left alone (not only other users'
files, which may not be at issue for a single-user system, but more
importantly system files). You could probably run any Vista system (or
*nix system) all the time as admin (or 'root'), but it would be a Very
Bad Idea. The fact that Vista requires you to (at least some of the
time) use admin privilege to work with a statistical package (i.e., to
upgrade its executable or ado-files) is an illustration of why
Windows--even Vista, with its touted improvements--has had such a poor
track record with regard to system security, viruses, malware,
spyware, etc.etc. On a *nix system, I can install, update and run
Stata without acting in an admin role. On a *nix server, I have to
make a few changes using admin privileges to make Stata available to
all users. But that does not apply to a single-user *nix system. But
maybe Windows 7 will be able to catch up with the *nix security model
circa 1975.
Kit Baum, Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata:
http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/