Thank you so much for the stylerules! These are exactly what I'm
looking for.I'm so happy to find suggestions on stata programming
style.
Thanks again!
Mandy
On 2/12/09, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the plug. I am not sure that this is what Mandy is seeking,
> but anyone interested in style rules (add any ironic overtones you wish)
> will find that the write-up in
>
> SJ-5-4 pr0018 . . . . . . . . . . . . Suggestions on Stata programming
> style
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N.
> J. Cox
> Q4/05 SJ 5(4):560--566 (no
> commands)
> suggestions for good Stata programming style
>
> supersedes the document on SSC. That is accessible to all via
>
> <http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=pr0018>
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Kit Baum
>
> Nick Cox's stylerules might be useful: findit stylerules
>
> On Feb 12, 2009, at 02:33 ,Mandy wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if I sould combine these two steps together. Should I
> > take consideration of getting the commands simpler, more concise,and
> > more transparent in step 1 so that I don't need step 2 at all? Is the
> > two-step way usual or most people don't need the second step? Any
> > comments will be helpful. Thanks a lot!
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
