[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Re: XTMixed / Repeated Measures
From
David Airey <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Re: XTMixed / Repeated Measures
Date
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:05:08 -0600
I think you have to do something like what has been posted for other
estimation commands:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-02/msg00060.html
-Dave
On Jan 2, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Paul Bransom wrote:
David / Maarten,
Thank you for your assistance. I have a supplementary question.
Following anova I often test and adjust for multiple comparisons.
With your example:
. test, test(m1) mtest(sidak)
( 1) a[1] - a[2] = 0
( 2) a[1] - a[3] = 0
( 3) a[1] - a[4] = 0
( 4) a[2] - a[3] = 0
( 5) a[2] - a[4] = 0
( 6) a[3] - a[4] = 0
Constraint 3 dropped
Constraint 4 dropped
Constraint 5 dropped
---------------------------------------
| F(df,21) df p
-------+-------------------------------
(1) | 0.71 1 0.9571 #
(2) | 4.45 1 0.2513 #
(3) | 30.08 1 0.0001 #
(4) | 1.60 1 0.7740 #
(5) | 21.53 1 0.0008 #
(6) | 11.39 1 0.0170 #
-------+-------------------------------
all | 11.63 3 0.0001
---------------------------------------
# Sidak adjusted p-values
Is this possible to do after xtmixed as there is no design matrix?
Thanks.
Paul
--- On Wed, 31/12/08, David Airey <[email protected]> wrote:
From: David Airey <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: st: Re: XTMixed / Repeated Measures
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 31 December, 2008, 3:44 PM
use http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/examples/kirk/rb4,
clear
anova y a s, repeated(a)
test _coef[a[3]] = _coef[a[4]]
anova, regress // note a[4] was dropped
xi: xtmixed y i.a || s: // note a[1] was dropped
test _Ia_3 = _Ia_4
display r(chi2)/r(df) // scale to show F the same, but here
df 1
...shows the same results, yes, and wrt your question, the
coefficients shown are relative to the dropped group, in
this model. You can also change which group gets dropped.
On Dec 31, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Paul Bransom wrote:
Sorry - forgot the subject on my earlier posting
Hello,
I am trying to teach myself how to use xtmixed for
repeated measures anova. Using anova:
anova m method id,repeated(method)
I have a significant effect of method and I can
compare the methods:
test _coef[method[1]] = _coef[method[2]] ( 1)
method[1] - method[2] = 0
F( 1, 27) = 58.27
Prob > F = 0.0000
However when I use xtmixed
xi:xtmixed m i.method || id:
-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m | Coef. Std. Err. z
P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------
+----------------------------------------------------------
-------------+------
_Imethod_2 | -12.6 1.650589 -7.63 0.000
-15.8351 -9.364905
_Imethod_3 | -15.1 1.650589 -9.15 0.000
-18.3351 -11.8649
_Imethod_4 | -11.1 1.650589 -6.72 0.000
-14.3351 -7.864905
_cons | 38.6 2.253023 17.13 0.000
34.18416 43.01584
I can again compare all the methods:
. test _Imethod_2 = _Imethod_3
with the exception of method 1 as _Imethod_ is the
"reference" in the equation.
My question is - how can I compare the effect of
method 1 to the other methods or is the fact that these
coefficients have a significant p value sufficient (or am I
missing something that is so obvious)?
I am using Stata 10.
Thanks,
Paul
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |