|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: do-file hygeine
Fabulous. Many thanks for the suggestions from Nick and David and Kit.
Michael
Also perhaps (not yet seen by me, but I keep meaning to check it out)
M. Schwab, M. Karrenbach, and J. Claerbout, "Making scientific
computations reproducible," Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.
2, no. 6, pp. 61--67, November-December 2000.
David Radwin wrote:
In my opinion, more fundamental than the mechanics of managing
do-files is the philosophy that your work should be replicable by
another researcher in the sense that if she were to use the same
data and methods. In the specific case of Stata, that would ideally
mean the same dataset, do-files, and programs could be used to
create exactly the same results, including such niceties as using
the -set seed- command, but the replication principle goes far
beyond that.
A side benefit of this philosophy is that it may force you to be
more explicit and thoughtful about your data analysis decisions.
For a nice discussion of replication in the social sciences, see
Gary King, "Replication, Replication," PS: Political Science and
Politics, followed by comments from nineteen authors and a
response, Vol. XXVIII, No. 3 (September, 1995): pp. 443-499 and
http://gking.harvard.edu/projects/repl.shtml .
David
At 11:08 AM -0700 9/27/08, Michael McCulloch wrote:
I'd appreciate any pointers toward good do-file hygeine, i.e.
management practices to maximize good record keeping, with
resulting least likelihood of overlooking important details.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/