Yes, this was my mistake. Thanks.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Nick Cox wrote:
:There was no change in indexing in 10.
:Caleb might try -do- rather than -run-.
:
:Nick
:[email protected]
:
:Caleb Southworth
:
:Was there a change in indexing between Stata 9 & 10?
:
:In Stata 9, this generates a list of ids:
:
:forval i = 1/65 {
: di id[`i']
:}
:
:In Stata 10, the same loop on the same data generates no output.
:
:. set trace on
:
:. run "C:\DOCUME~1\cjs\LOCALS~1\Temp\STD05000000.tmp"
:- forval i = 1/65 {
:- di id[`i']
:= di id[1]
:- }
:- di id[`i']
:= di id[2]
:- }
:- di id[`i']
:= di id[3]
:- }
:[snip]
:
:But
:
:. di id[1]
:7
:
:Let me know where I've gone wrong.
:
:*
:* For searches and help try:
:* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
:* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
:* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
:
Caleb
[email protected]
University of Oregon Sociology
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
