There was no change in indexing in 10.
Caleb might try -do- rather than -run-.
Nick
[email protected]
Caleb Southworth
Was there a change in indexing between Stata 9 & 10?
In Stata 9, this generates a list of ids:
forval i = 1/65 {
di id[`i']
}
In Stata 10, the same loop on the same data generates no output.
. set trace on
. run "C:\DOCUME~1\cjs\LOCALS~1\Temp\STD05000000.tmp"
- forval i = 1/65 {
- di id[`i']
= di id[1]
- }
- di id[`i']
= di id[2]
- }
- di id[`i']
= di id[3]
- }
[snip]
But
. di id[1]
7
Let me know where I've gone wrong.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
