|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: RE: estout with lags
From
Scott Cunningham <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: estout with lags
Date
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:06:01 -0400
Ah, that should've been obvious. I was trying - keep(L1. L2.) and
that was the problem. That makes no sense, in retrospect, if you are
using multiple lags on different variables. Sorry for such an
obvious question.Here's an example:
. webuse grunfeld
. xi: xtreg invest L(0/2).mvalue i.time, fe
(output omitted)
. estout , keep(mvalue L.mvalue L2.mvalue)
.
b
mvalue .1629381
L.mvalue .0744972
L2.mvalue .0314575
Furthermore:
But I am programming estout to write rows stating "yes" or "no" as to
whether a specific fixed effect was used, rather than report the
value on the fixed effect.
I have been asked repeatedly to add such functionality. I'd be
interested in your solution.
Here's what I do. I manually code it within prefoot.
prefoot("Year Effects & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes"
"State Effects & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes"
"Age Effects & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes"
"State-Age Effects & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes"
"Linear Interpolations & No & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes"
"�midrule")
sc
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |