Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Joe Canner <jcanner1@jhmi.edu> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: RE: psmatch2 vs attk |
| Date | Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:11:38 +0000 |
Rossella, It's hard to say for sure without seeing more details, but I see that you are using the -comsup- option for -attk-, but you are not using the corresponding -common- option for -psmatch2-. Try adding that and see if it helps. Regards, Joe Canner Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Rossella Verzulli Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:58 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: psmatch2 vs attk Dear Statalist I'm running the following commands to estimate the average treatment effects with the Kernel Matching method: psmatch2 T, out(performance) kernel kerneltype(normal) pscore(mypscore) attk performance T, normal pscore(mypscore) comsup Does anybody know why psmatch2 and attk produce slightly different output? I will very grateful for your advice. Best, Rossella * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/