Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: psmatch2 vs attk
From
Joe Canner <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: psmatch2 vs attk
Date
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:11:38 +0000
Rossella,
It's hard to say for sure without seeing more details, but I see that you are using the -comsup- option for -attk-, but you are not using the corresponding -common- option for -psmatch2-. Try adding that and see if it helps.
Regards,
Joe Canner
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rossella Verzulli
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: psmatch2 vs attk
Dear Statalist
I'm running the following commands to estimate the average treatment effects with the Kernel Matching method:
psmatch2 T, out(performance) kernel kerneltype(normal) pscore(mypscore)
attk performance T, normal pscore(mypscore) comsup
Does anybody know why psmatch2 and attk produce slightly different output?
I will very grateful for your advice.
Best,
Rossella
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/