Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Propensity score matching after multiple imputation
From
natalia malancu <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Propensity score matching after multiple imputation
Date
Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:55:35 +1100
Hi Cesare!
thank you for the suggestion. I was somewhat familiar with the paper,
but I guess out the two troubling cases Adam was talking about, this
could represent a fix (if the data permits it) for missing cases on
the outcome variable. I find it hard to nominate a treatment variable
in order to impute the missings on my treatment variable (hope that
makes sense).
Best,
Natalia
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:44 PM, cesare riillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe you want to read the following paper that includes routines to deal with missing data.
>
> Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009).
> cem : Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata Journal, (4), 524–546.
> kind Regards
>
> Cesare
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/