Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Propensity score matching after multiple imputation


From   natalia malancu <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Propensity score matching after multiple imputation
Date   Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:55:35 +1100

Hi Cesare!

thank you for the suggestion. I was somewhat familiar with the paper,
but I guess out the two  troubling cases Adam was talking about, this
could represent a fix (if the data permits it) for missing cases on
the outcome variable. I find it hard to nominate a treatment variable
in order to impute the missings on my treatment variable (hope that
makes sense).

Best,
Natalia

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:44 PM, cesare riillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe you want to read the following paper that includes routines to deal with missing data.
>
> Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009).
> cem : Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata Journal, (4), 524–546.
> kind Regards
>
> Cesare
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index