Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: st: heckprob using multiple imputation
From
Klaus Nowotny <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: Re: st: heckprob using multiple imputation
Date
Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:49:09 +0100
Dear Marcus,
thanks, I was alredy aware of the posting. I am currently more inclined
to use the second model and impute both y and income (either by mvn or
ice, since y is binary) to preserve the common patterns in the data, but
to drop the imputed values for y before estimating the outcome equation.
In any case, at least in my data it does not seem to make any
statistically significant difference whether y is imputed along with
income or not, but still, input from an expert on the topic would be
highly appreciated.
Klaus
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/