Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Random slope model in runmlwin


From   Ashish Gupta <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Random slope model in runmlwin
Date   Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:22:01 +0530

hello Statalisters,

I am working on impact of contextual factors on  some health outcomes using
DHS data. For this purpose I am using  Runmlwin  program for running
MLwIN within stata.I am employing the two level random intercept and
random slope models. At the level one i am considering individual
observation while at second level I am aggregating the individual
level variable at area(psu) level

the syntax for the model is

runmlwin con_use cons pl_res literate sli_medi sli_high sur_daug
age20_34 age35_44,

>level2(psu:cons nav_sli pro_cast) ///

>level1(lineno:)///

>discrete(distribution(binomial)link(logit)denominator(cons) pql2)///

I would like to ask that whether model specification at level 2 is
appropriate i.e psu level variable  (nav_sli and pro_caste) which are
aggregate of  individual level  at psu (area) level in random part of
the model.

Any positive response will be appreciated.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index