Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, as the output shows there is only one observation (and this is
what you ask for). You cannot estimate a standard error from one
observation.
To be more precise, since the within-imputation variance cannot be
calculated (because there is only one observation) and therefore
returns missing, the total variance is also missing. This follows from
the simple fact that T = W + (1+1/M)B, where T is the total variance,
W is the mean of the within imputation variance, M is the number of
imputations and B is the between-imputation variance.
If you (for whatever reasons) are interested in the between-imputation
variance I suggest merely using -summarize- or the like, as -mi- will
probably not help here.
Best
Daniel
--
I have multiply-imputed data: the "SWIID" data, downloaded from
http://myweb.uiowa.edu/fsolt/swiid/swiid.html. The data consist of
country-year observations (173 countries, annually 1960 onwards). For
each observation, there are 100 multiply-imputed estimates of
"gini_net" (Gini coefficient of income inequality).
[...]
I would like to derive MI estimates of gini_net for a particular year,
say Denmark in 1989.
[...]
The "Std. Err." estimate is missing -- why?
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/