Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Instrument Validity tests for Heckman 1979
From
"Kyrizi, Andri" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Instrument Validity tests for Heckman 1979
Date
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:22:29 +0000
Dear all,
In regards to yesterday's question and answer,
Does anyone know if I could use a two step heckman approach instead of the treatreg approach?
And test it using the -ltrest-?
Would that still be correct?
All the best,
Andri
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Kyrizi, Andri [[email protected]]
Sent: 10 March 2014 18:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: st: Instrument Validity tests for Heckman 1979
Hello Prof Antonakis,
Thank you so much for your reply and help!
All the best,
Andri
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of John Antonakis [[email protected]]
Sent: 10 March 2014 17:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Instrument Validity tests for Heckman 1979
Hi:
See the following (if you are talking about an overidentification test):
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-10/msg00915.html
A -heckman- and -treatreg- (now -etregress-) basically do the same
thing, the difference being that the former has a truncated sample on y.
So, it seems to me you can use the -ltrest- as explained by Mark Schaffer.
Best,
J.
__________________________________________
John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management
Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor:
The Leadership Quarterly
Organizational Research Methods
__________________________________________
On 10.03.2014 18:06, Kyrizi, Andri wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
>
> I would like to test the validity of my instruments after using the Heckman's (1979) two-step sample selection model. In particular I want to correct for the selectivity bias for using only employed individuals.
>
> I've searched everywhere to find a way to test them but could't find anything. I am aware that a topic on 'diagnostics for the treatreg procedure' exists but I don't think it relates to my question.
>
> I would really appreciate any guidance you could give me!
>
> Many thanks,
> Andri
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/