Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: problem with negative binomial fixed effect model
From
Nahla Betelmal <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: problem with negative binomial fixed effect model
Date
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:39:49 +0000
Dear Statalist,
I want to apply fixed effect negative binomial model on my panel data.
the panel variable is firm and I control for year effect by year
indicator variable as follow:
xtnbreg dependent-variable independent-variables i.year, fe
However, I found this paper by Paul D. Allison and Richard Waterman,
"FIXED-EFFECTS NEGATIVE BINOMIAL REGRESSION MODELS " which argues that
the above command does not actually produce the correct fixed-effect
negative binomial model.
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~allison/FENB.pdf
Instead the authors present the case to include indicator variable
(dummy variable) to get the fixed-effect estimates, so the command
should be as follow
nbreg dependent-variable independent-variables i.year i.firm
In my case there is a problem in using this command as I have large
number of firms, 1,200 firms for years from 1993-2010. I got the error
matsize too small, r(908);
Is there a way in Stata to get the correct fixed-effect estimates as
suggested by the above authors ? I have 12.1 version, MP edition
Thank you for all the help
Best Regards
Nahla Betelmal
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/