Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Dynamic almost ideal demand system


From   Nigussie Tefera <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Dynamic almost ideal demand system
Date   Sat, 8 Mar 2014 06:09:52 +0100

Hi Jorge,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion.

Yes, I am exactly referring to Ray (1984) A dynamic generalization of
the almost ideal demand system but forget to put under quotation. I
should have to write it as In " A dynamic generalization of the almost
ideal demand system", by Ray (1984) ....

Best

Nigussie

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I got confused by the paper by Ray in a previous thread. You provided
> the full reference for
>  here but it did not look like so. Should have been
>
> Ray (1984) A dynamic generalisation of the almost ideal demand system
>
> In any case, I looked at the papers Ray cites in the first paragraph
> and both base inclusion of the lagged values of expenditures on habit
> formation equations formulated in levels, so to be strictly consistent
> with those papers the lagged values should be included in levels.
>
> Including them in logs may make more econometric sense and provide a
> better fit, but it will not be strictly consistent with those papers.
> You should think whether the habit formation equations can be
> rewritten such that the demand equations include lagged log
> consumption, by a change of scale in coefficients perhaps. If so,
> there shouldn't be a problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Jorge Eduardo Pérez Pérez
> Graduate Student
> Department of Economics
> Brown University
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nigussie Tefera
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear stat list
>>
>> In a dynamic generalization of the the almost ideal demand system,
>> Ray(1984) modeled total food expenditure in log terms (lntfexp) whilst
>> its lag without log transformation (tfexp_1); also lag of expenditure
>> for each food groups is without long transformation. For practical
>> estimation, I want to make sure whether the log or alternative
>> (absolute terms) should be considered or not. Your suggestion is very
>> welcome.
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Nigusise
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index