Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: combination of k elements each being 0 or 1
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: combination of k elements each being 0 or 1
Date
Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:45:57 +0000
Following Fernando's insight, this is possible with the -egen-
function -base()- from -egenmore- (SSC). The help for -egenmore-
spells out ways to unpack the string variable into separate variables.
. clear
. local x 8
. set obs `=2^`x''
obs was 0, now 256
. gen dec = _n - 1
. egen bin = base(dec)
. l if inrange(_n, 1,4) | inrange(_n, 253,256) , sep(4)
+----------------+
| dec bin |
|----------------|
1. | 0 00000000 |
2. | 1 00000001 |
3. | 2 00000010 |
4. | 3 00000011 |
|----------------|
253. | 252 11111100 |
254. | 253 11111101 |
255. | 254 11111110 |
256. | 255 11111111 |
+----------------+
Nick
[email protected]
On 4 March 2014 18:30, Fernando Rios Avila <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Gregorio,
> I do have a suggestion for the generalization of your algorithm. What
> you are doing can be thought as the transformation from a number from
> base 10 to base 2
> It could go something like: (using your base code).
> clear
> local x 8
> local n=2^`x'
> set obs `n'
> gen v0=""
> forvalues i=1/`n' {
> local n2=`i'-1
> inbase 2 `n2'
> return list
> replace v0=r(base) in `i'
> }
>
> destring v0, replace
>
> forvalues i=1/`x' {
> gen v`i'=mod(v0,10)
> replace v0=int(v0/10)
> }
>
> HTH
> Fernando
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Impavido, Gregorio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I would like to define a matrix (2^k x k) with all possible combinations of k elements each being 0 or 1. The code below produces what I want for k = 5 and can be modified for different values of k. My questions are:
>>
>> - Is there a matrix function in STATA or MATA that generalizes the code below for variable k?
>> - If not, does anybody have suggestions on how to generalize the loop for variable k?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your help
>> Gregorio
>>
>>
>>
>> ******* begin example
>> clear
>> set more off
>> local x 5
>>
>> local n = 2^`x'
>> set obs `n'
>>
>> forvalues i = 1/`x' {
>> gen v`i' = .
>> }
>>
>> * set trace on
>> local j = 1
>> while `j' < `n' {
>> forvalues i1 = 0/1 {
>> forvalues i2 = 0/1 {
>> forvalues i3 = 0/1 {
>> forvalues i4 = 0/1 {
>> forvalues i5 = 0/1 {
>> forvalues l = 1/`x' {
>> replace v`l' = `i`l'' in `j'
>> }
>> local j = `j' + 1
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> ******* end example
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/