Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | sudha mani <prof.smani@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Interactions between endogenous and exogenous variables using ivreg2 |
Date | Sat, 1 Mar 2014 15:58:52 -0500 |
Dear Satalist users: I am using ivreg2 to estimate the following model and would like guidance on the treatment of the interaction between an endogenous and exogenous variable. The panel data includes approximately 300 firms over 15 years. I am using Stata 11.2 for Windows and I would like to estimate the following model: Y=X1+X2+X3+X1X2+X1X3+X4+error Where, X1 is endogenous. X2 and X3 are exogenous X1X2 and X1X3 are the interaction terms and are thus endogenous X4 is a vector of control variables (included instruments). Z1 and Z2 are valid excluded instruments for X1. As I understand I can instrument the interaction terms using one of the following methods. First, if I understand Wooldridge's approach correctly, then I can use the following strategy to instrument the interaction term. Reg X1 X2 X3 X4 Z1 Z2 Predict X1hat g X1hatX2=X1hat*X2 g X1hatX3=X1hat*X3 Ivreg2 Y X2 X3 X4 (X1 X1X2 X1X3=X1hat X1hatX2 X1hatX3), gmm2s cluster(firm) robust Is the above a correct implementation of Wooldridge's approach in Stata? Is the instrumentation strategy valid under conditions of heteroscedasticity? Second, an alternative instrumentation strategy for the interaction term is as follows: g X2Z1=X2*Z1 g X2Z2=X2*Z2 g X3Z1=X3*Z1 g X3Z2=X3*Z2 Ivreg2 Y X2 X3 X4(X1 X1X2 X1X3=Z1 Z2 X2Z1 X2Z2 X3Z1 X3Z2), gmm2s cluster(firm) robust Is there a loss of efficiency in the GMM case? Finally, what if I instrument the interaction term with its lag, where Z3 is the lag of (X1X2) and Z4 is the lag of (X1X3)? Ivreg2 Y X2 X3 X4 (X1 X1X2 X1X3=(Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4), gmm2s cluster(firm) robust I test the validity of the instruments Z3 and Z4 using the Sargan C test. The results indicate the lagged variables of the interaction term were uncorrelated with the error term in the second-stage regression. Is it fair to say that the instruments Z3 and Z4 are valid, but there is further loss of efficiency than with methods 1 and 2? I would greatly appreciate if the list participants could weigh in on each of the instrumentation strategies for the interaction term. Thank you! Sudha -- _____________ Dr. Sudha Mani William Paterson University * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/