Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xi i. year dummy in regression only for certain years
From
Jeremy Wells <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xi i. year dummy in regression only for certain years
Date
Sun, 5 May 2013 12:59:24 -0500
Ah, sorry I missed that. I'll let the experts take over then.
Jeremy Wells
Ph.D. Student
LSU Dept. of Poli. Sci.
Jeremy,
I have Stata 10.1, which does not include fvvarlist and doesn't allow for a command like you suggested. Also, I want to avoid having to redefine the years included (here: 98/103) every time that I change the time period considered.
Do you have any suggestions for a solution in Stata 10.1?
On 04.05.2013, at 20:08, Jeremy Wells wrote:
> Barbara,
>
> Look at -help fvvarlist-.
>
> If 1910 is your first year, then 2006 would be the 97th value, and I will omit that year as your base reference, so I believe your command would look like the following:
>
> xi: reg dep indep i(98/103).year if (year>2006 & year<=2011)
>
> HTH,
>
> Jeremy Wells
> Ph.D. Student
> LSU Dept. of Poli. Sci.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> *
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
*
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/