Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: confusion
From
montaha <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: confusion
Date
Sat, 4 May 2013 08:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
hello everybody,
i need your help guys
i had to test for fixed and random effects using STATA.
I got the following tables which shows that
In "fixed effects" output the signs of the coefficient are totally different
from anticipated signs in theory, additionally some of them are
insignificant.
But in Random effect output the signs are true and they are significant.
when i did Hausman test.. the prob>chi2 was 0.000 which indicates that i
shall use Fixed effect
but as i have mentioned the signs are not as expected and they are not
significant...
the output
<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/1_1.png>
<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/2_2.png>
<http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/file/n7580362/3_3.png>
thank u i advance
--
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/confusion-tp7580362.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
