Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: non-normal residuals
From
Xixi Lin <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: non-normal residuals
Date
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:36:53 -0500
Hi JVerkuilen,
Thanks for your help. I have a question about the skewness. How to
tell the skewness from the qnorm plot? Or is there any test that I can
test the skewness of the residuals?
Thanks,
Xixi Lin
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:41 AM, JVerkuilen (Gmail)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Lots depends on details you've not indicated but I largely agree with
> Maarten. Non-Gaussianity is in itself not a huge problem, but skew or
> other clear patterns in the residuals may be a sign that the linear
> regression is not correct. You may have an omitted variable, for
> instance. A transformation may help if it makes sense, but I wouldn't
> do it just to fix up residuals.
>
> If you have a reasonable regression model and still have mild
> non-Gaussianity (which is best diagnosed using -qnorm-) then
> bootstrapping or robust standard errors is a good fix.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/