Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: non-normal residuals
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: non-normal residuals
Date
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:41:08 -0500
Lots depends on details you've not indicated but I largely agree with
Maarten. Non-Gaussianity is in itself not a huge problem, but skew or
other clear patterns in the residuals may be a sign that the linear
regression is not correct. You may have an omitted variable, for
instance. A transformation may help if it makes sense, but I wouldn't
do it just to fix up residuals.
If you have a reasonable regression model and still have mild
non-Gaussianity (which is best diagnosed using -qnorm-) then
bootstrapping or robust standard errors is a good fix.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/