Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist
From
Bert Lloyd <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist
Date
Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:37:52 -0500
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:45 PM, William Buchanan
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what value is gained from labeling missing values when there is no indication why the values are
> missing to begin with. If you know why specific values are missing then just use the extended missing values
> and label away.
Here is one example:
Suppose there are .-values in variable A.
estpost tabulate A B, mi
esttab using whatever.tex, booktabs replace ///
unstack label
The problem is that esttab exports "_missing_", which causes problems
in latex. One can substitute("_missing_" "Missing") but it would be
more straightforward if .-values were labeled properly from the start.
> If you're concerned about missing string values you could just replace the missing value with whatever you
> planned to label it as.
But then they wouldn't be missing.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 19, 2013, at 15:24, Bert Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Allow a value label for . (sysmiss, numeric missing value).
>>
>> Extended missing values for string variables.
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/