Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance
Date
Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:24:50 -0500
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Mário Marques <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks you for your comments, I am going to explore a little more the
> option of re. There is no option on both xtpoisson and xtnbreg for
> robust standard erros :(,
I'm not sure why that would be the case but you're right.
I was wondering whether it was possible to
> obtain them "manually" (installing a routine or...), the referee's
> report of my paper asks for it... Let see what I can do.
I wonder if -suest- can be tricked into getting them for you?
Jay
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/