Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance |
| Date | Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:24:50 -0500 |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Mário Marques <mmarques@eeg.uminho.pt> wrote: > > Thanks you for your comments, I am going to explore a little more the > option of re. There is no option on both xtpoisson and xtnbreg for > robust standard erros :(, I'm not sure why that would be the case but you're right. I was wondering whether it was possible to > obtain them "manually" (installing a routine or...), the referee's > report of my paper asks for it... Let see what I can do. I wonder if -suest- can be tricked into getting them for you? Jay * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/