Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance
Date
Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:11:04 -0500
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Mário Marques <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a count data panel (xtnbreg) and I have modelled the number of
> new foreign firms on a set of indepvars using country-pairs fixed
> effects.
> A referee suggested me recently to include year dummies to account for
> time trends, the results obtained before and after the inclusion of
> these variables are as follows:
You can simply use a LR test here by fitting the nested model.
However, you might note that there are a bunch of clusters being
dropped for being all 0, which happens because you have no variance on
the DV and are using a fixed effects estimator. Is this of concern?
--
JVVerkuilen, PhD
[email protected]
http://lesswrong.com/
"Everybody loves progress but nobody likes change." ---Fortune cookie, 1/13/13.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/