RE: st: Stata 13 wishlist

["Jacobs, David" <jacobs.184@sociology.osu.edu>]

For the last 10 years or so I've been hoping for pooled time-series additions such as xt-zero inflated count models, xt multinomial logit, xt stereotypic logit etc.

Commands like these have been implemented in the econometric package called Limdep, so such things clearly are possible but I strongly prefer to use Stata.

Dave Jacobs

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of John Antonakis
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:31 AM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: Stata 13 wishlist

Hi Billy:

Right...here is the post:

http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-08/msg01453.html

Still, ADF doesn't have all the advantages that what WLSMV (i.e., Muthén's robust WLS) does.

Best,
J.

__________________________________________

Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 02.01.2013 17:21, William Buchanan wrote:
> It's been requested several times previously, but including some capacity to control the transparency in graphs (e.g., an option for alpha blending). Adding some documentation to help end-users develop new graph commands more easily would also be incredibly helpful (Sergey R. presented on this topic and the Beamer slides can be found easily via google).
>
> Re: John,
> I'm not in the best Internet browsing situation at the moment, but I had read a post where either Cameron McIntosh or Stas Kolenikov suggested that the ADF estimator is equivalent to the WLS estimator in Mplus.
>
> If nothing else I think speeding up some of the -xt- commands would be pretty awesome (e.g., xtmelogit, xtmepoisson, etc...). Another previously mentioned suggestion was to help make it easier for users to integrate Stata with other scripting and/or programming languages (i.e., python).
>
> Since the documentation is prepared in LaTeX, maybe an electronic copy in a format other than PDF would be helpful as well.
>
> Just my $ 0.02,
> Billy
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:53, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Postings on this point seem to be overlooking the Graph Recorder.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch> wrote:
>>> I second that suggestion:
>>>
>>> "to show commands and syntaxes in the results window". Oftentimes, 
>>> it is hard to figure out the syntax when making minor edits to a 
>>> graph....it would be so helpful if we could see the syntax that makes the change.
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/