Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
Date
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:53:46 +0100
No one said that. You can plot the residuals, or their squares, or
their absolute values, or roots of absolute values -- there are
arguments for each -- against anything of interest, e.g. a predictor
or fitted values. See e.g.
SJ-4-4 gr0009 . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Graphing model diagnostics
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
(help anovaplot, indexplot, modeldiag, ofrtplot, ovfplot,
qfrplot, racplot, rdplot, regplot, rhetplot, rvfplot2,
rvlrplot, rvpplot2 if installed)
Q4/04 SJ 4(4):449--475
plotting diagnostic information calculated from residuals
and fitted values from regression models with continuous
responses
for one broad discussion. That paper says nothing specific about
-tobit- models, however.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you. So, there is no possibility to check heteroscedasticity graphically?
>
> Ebru
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:25:14 -0400
>> Subject: Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > With default do you mean without robust standard error or something else?
>> >
>> Yes, the default is OIM.
>>
>>
>> > ----------------------------------------
>> >> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:57:59 -0400
>> >> Subject: Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
>> >> From: [email protected]
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Thank you very much. One last question altough it is slightly different from the main issue:
>> >> >
>> >> > In order to test heteroscedasticity assumption can I use scatter plots etc? or do I need to use a formal test like for testing normality issue?
>> >>
>> >> I think I'd probably use both, as the test just says "there appears to
>> >> be heteroscedasticity" but doesn't tell you much about what it might
>> >> be. One other quick and cheap diagnoser of heteroscedasticity is to
>> >> run with robust standard errors and with default. If they appear to
>> >> differ much, that's a sign you have a problem.
>> >> *
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/