Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
From
Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
Date
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 16:27:39 +0300
Thanks. I checked it too. But I just wanted to learn is there a way of testing normality apart from a formal test like histogram, scatter plots?
Ebru
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:22:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: st: Normally distributed error term & testing normality of residuals
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thank you Nick.
> >
> > I asked it for Tobit model.
>
> Then it matters quite a bit, but checking -tobit- postestimation,
> there doesn't appear to be residuals. This is usually a sign that it's
> hard to define a meaningful one, which makes sense because the Tobit
> model is partially observed and partially latent. There's no way the
> observed residuals can be normal.
>
> I checked in Chapter 16 of Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised
> Edition (A. C. Cameron & P K. Trivedi, Stata Press, 2010) and they
> provide some examples of how to test the normality and
> heteroscedasticity assumption. There's a good bit you have to to do
> get this to work and their example takes up several pages. Someone
> might have an example floating around on the net somewhere, not sure.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/