Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: RE: Truncated sample or Heckman selection
From
Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: Re: st: RE: Truncated sample or Heckman selection
Date
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:56:02 +0200
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. I restrict sample to innovating firms and the dependent variables that I am interested in are percentages therefore, you agree on that I should use fractional logit model.
>
> 2. I do not need to do Heckman sample selection even though I restrict my sample. I also want to mention that yes I do not have some Xs but I still do have other Xs for non-innovators which I use them as control variables.
In that end the choice of model can only be yours not ours, so don't
try to shift responsibility for your choices on us.
> 3. Do you think using a different model puts me trouble?
Of course it will cause trouble; all models cause trouble.
> 4. I use Stata 10 so can I use fractional logit model?
yes
> 5. What about if I have a panel data? Is fractional logit model still applicable?
I vaguely remember that Jeff Wooldridge published some papers on that,
you might want to look those up.
-- Maarten
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/