Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Re: st: Re: st: RE: Truncated sample or Heckman selection
From
Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Re: st: Re: st: RE: Truncated sample or Heckman selection
Date
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 00:53:09 +0300
Innovation success is heavily left-censored - many firms do not have any market novelties and thus no sales from this type of innovation (Grimpe & Kaiser, 2010).
Is that wrong then?
I'm really confused now.
Ebru
----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 16:45:59 -0500
> Subject: st: Re: st: Re: st: RE: Truncated sample or Heckman selection
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Ebru Ozturk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For Tobit regression, the dependent variable is the percent of total firm sales revenues that derived from the sales of new products. Therefore, it is censored as sales of new products can only be zero or positive.
> >
> This just isn't a censoring problem. Consider having a look at:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censoring_%28statistics%29
>
> Joerg
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/